Explicit
Transcribed
Diddy's Legal Team Fires Back At The Prosecution (11/6/24)
Nov 7, 2024 ·
10m 15s
Sign up for free
Listen to this episode and many more. Enjoy the best podcasts on Spreaker!
Download and listen anywhere
Download your favorite episodes and enjoy them, wherever you are! Sign up or log in now to access offline listening.
Diddy's Legal Team Fires Back At The Prosecution (11/6/24)
This is an automatically generated transcript. Please note that complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Description
In United States v. Combs, 24-cr-542 (AS), counsel for Mr. Sean Combs submitted a reply supporting the motion to limit extrajudicial statements made by potential witnesses and their attorneys, as...
show more
In United States v. Combs, 24-cr-542 (AS), counsel for Mr. Sean Combs submitted a reply supporting the motion to limit extrajudicial statements made by potential witnesses and their attorneys, as referenced in ECF No. 42. This filing responds to the government’s opposition (ECF No. 53) following the Court's directive on November 4, 2024 (ECF No. 58). In its opposition, the government contends that granting the motion would either necessitate a broad order covering all civil complainants and their legal representatives or compel the government to reveal its victims and witnesses ahead of schedule.
Mr. Combs' counsel argues that either outcome is reasonable. The defense believes limiting public statements by witnesses and their counsel is essential for preserving a fair trial environment and preventing undue influence on public opinion. Furthermore, they assert that requiring the government to disclose potential witnesses or victims early would not be prejudicial, as it would promote transparency and fairness in the proceedings.
(commercial at 7:49)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
2024.11.05 Combs 23.1 letter 110524
show less
Mr. Combs' counsel argues that either outcome is reasonable. The defense believes limiting public statements by witnesses and their counsel is essential for preserving a fair trial environment and preventing undue influence on public opinion. Furthermore, they assert that requiring the government to disclose potential witnesses or victims early would not be prejudicial, as it would promote transparency and fairness in the proceedings.
(commercial at 7:49)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
2024.11.05 Combs 23.1 letter 110524
Information
| Author | Bobby Capucci |
| Organization | Bobby Capucci |
| Website | - |
| Tags |
Copyright 2024 - Spreaker Inc. an iHeartMedia Company
