Explicit
Transcribed
Murder In Moscow: The State Of Idaho's Response To The Amazon Click Activity Motion (3/20/25)
Mar 20, 2025 ·
11m 24s
Download and listen anywhere
Download your favorite episodes and enjoy them, wherever you are! Sign up or log in now to access offline listening.
Murder In Moscow: The State Of Idaho's Response To The Amazon Click Activity Motion (3/20/25)
This is an automatically generated transcript. Please note that complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Description
In response to Defendant Bryan Kohberger's Motion in Limine #9, which seeks to exclude evidence of his Amazon click activity at trial, the State argues that such evidence is both...
show more
In response to Defendant Bryan Kohberger's Motion in Limine #9, which seeks to exclude evidence of his Amazon click activity at trial, the State argues that such evidence is both relevant and admissible. The prosecution contends that Kohberger's Amazon activity, particularly his purchase of a Ka-Bar knife and related items in March 2022, is directly linked to the case. They assert that this evidence demonstrates Kohberger's possession of a knife matching the sheath found at the crime scene, which contained his DNA. Additionally, the State maintains that the Amazon click activity is pertinent, as it reflects Kohberger's interest in knives and accessories both before and after the alleged offenses.
The State refutes the defense's claim that the Amazon data is incomplete or taken out of context, asserting that the evidence was obtained through a valid search warrant and encompasses relevant periods before and after the crimes. They argue that the click activity is not unfairly prejudicial and that its probative value outweighs any potential prejudice. The prosecution also emphasizes that the evidence is not misleading and that any concerns about Amazon's algorithms influencing user behavior do not diminish the relevance of Kohberger's specific search and purchase history. Therefore, the State requests that the court deny the defendant's motion and allow the Amazon click activity evidence to be presented at trial.
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
031725-States-Response-Defendants-MiL-9-RE-Excluding-Amazon-Click-Activity-Trial.pdf
show less
The State refutes the defense's claim that the Amazon data is incomplete or taken out of context, asserting that the evidence was obtained through a valid search warrant and encompasses relevant periods before and after the crimes. They argue that the click activity is not unfairly prejudicial and that its probative value outweighs any potential prejudice. The prosecution also emphasizes that the evidence is not misleading and that any concerns about Amazon's algorithms influencing user behavior do not diminish the relevance of Kohberger's specific search and purchase history. Therefore, the State requests that the court deny the defendant's motion and allow the Amazon click activity evidence to be presented at trial.
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
031725-States-Response-Defendants-MiL-9-RE-Excluding-Amazon-Click-Activity-Trial.pdf
Information
| Author | Bobby Capucci |
| Organization | Bobby Capucci |
| Website | - |
| Tags |
Copyright 2025 - Spreaker Inc. an iHeartMedia Company
Comments